[Leps-l] Monarch subspecies (was: Finally Announced...)
Douglas Yanega
dyanega at gmail.com
Fri May 27 12:42:58 EDT 2022
Just an FYI from an ICZN Commissioner:
The ICZN regulates names from superfamily down to subspecies, but:
(1) any names proposed or used below subspecies are unregulated -
meaning a presently-recognized variety, form, or other infrasubspecific
entity is *nomenclaturally unavailable* - technically, it has neither an
authorship, nor a date, and is not subject to the rules of priority.
Names proposed for "forms" or "varieties" published before 1960 can
*sometimes* be available, but only under very specific circumstances.
So, for the monarch, "form nivosus" should never be given with an
authorship or date, *or italicized*, as it is not actually a
species-rank name, and under the Code only species-rank (species and
subspecies) and genus-rank (genus and subgenus) names are ever italicized.
(2) the Code does not provide a *biological* definition of the various
ranks, even though it does limit the ranks it governs. A species, or a
subspecies, is whatever a taxonomist says it is, and all the Code
defines is whether that entity's name has been properly published, and
how it is to be treated once it has been published (spelling,
authorship, date, etc.).
That being said, in my experience the most common use of subspecies in
taxonomy is for populations that are allopatric/allochronic, with
characters that reliably distinguish them, but for which the presumption
is that were they to ever secondarily come into contact, they would
produce fully fertile offspring. If there is routine gene flow between
two populations, or no characters distinguishing them, they would not
generally conform to this definition. In that respect, the question
regarding monarchs would be whether a person could be given a monarch
specimen with no collection data, and still tell definitively (by DNA or
some other technique) which population it belonged to? If the answer is
yes, then how many distinct populations can be identified? That would
give the upper limit on assignable subspecies.
Peace,
--
Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314 skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
https://faculty.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/leps-l/attachments/20220527/d1c2758c/attachment.html>
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list